<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Umar in Dubai - Latest Comments in My blog works best with Firefox</title><link>http://umarindubai.disqus.com/</link><description>Out and about in Dubai</description><atom:link href="https://umarindubai.disqus.com/my_blog_works_best_with_firefox/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:55:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My blog works best with Firefox</title><link>http://umarsiddiqi.com/blog/my-blog-works-best-with-firefox/#comment-15127009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;fire fox works with open source web technologies, while IE is great with microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Syed Tayyab Ali</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:55:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My blog works best with Firefox</title><link>http://umarsiddiqi.com/blog/my-blog-works-best-with-firefox/#comment-15127008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;but it keeps eating memory if you keep it on for long hours. Atleast I did feel something like that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adnan Siddiqi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:47:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My blog works best with Firefox</title><link>http://umarsiddiqi.com/blog/my-blog-works-best-with-firefox/#comment-15127007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been using firefox for years and I never had memory issues. It takes a few extra seconds to load but after that its a smooth ride.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">umar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:04:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My blog works best with Firefox</title><link>http://umarsiddiqi.com/blog/my-blog-works-best-with-firefox/#comment-15127006</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My internet usage often involves research, and I have to multi-task. While Firefox does use more memory than IE for 1/2 tabs, but it quickly levels off when you have say a dozen tabs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I won't use IE even if it uses 10x less memory. Its insecure. Completely. Its trivial to remotely infect a PC running IE.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, they are working on some pretty cool memory management stuff for Firefox 3, some of which I find quite interesting as a developer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">waqas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:52:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My blog works best with Firefox</title><link>http://umarsiddiqi.com/blog/my-blog-works-best-with-firefox/#comment-15127005</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Firefox is 10x a better browser simply because it's more secure, extensible and what not. But yes, it is a memory hog and although I'm a big fan of it even I switch to IE whenever I'm running low on memory.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Raza</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:22:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My blog works best with Firefox</title><link>http://umarsiddiqi.com/blog/my-blog-works-best-with-firefox/#comment-15127004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I switched to Mozilla Firefox then switched back...I guess I am an average user and I want to get the job done when I get online.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mozilla takes up more memory...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">UTP</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:56:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>